| PAPERS
: Chad-Cameroon Pipeline Project |
| page 1 of 6 |
| Socio-Environmental Impact of
the Chad-Cameroon Pipeline Project |
Sarah E. Perkins, B.A. (Hon);
JD candidate 2004, University of Toronto Faculty of Law
The Canadian Great Ape Alliance |
| |
|
| |
|
|
| Abstract—This
report highlights some of the enviro/socio issues emerging
out of the Chad-Cameroon pipeline project. The report
is a result of a 17-day trip to Cameroon during which
the author met with NGO’s, government, private
sector and affected community members. The trip and
report are a result of an international human rights
internship sponsored by the University of Toronto Faculty
of Law’s International Human Rights Program.
I. INTRODUCTION
The summer of 2000, the World Bank approved the construction
of the controversial Chad-Cameroon pipeline project.
The project included the development of 300 oil wells
in Southern Chad, which would connect to a 650- mile
pipeline extending from Doba, Chad, to offshore storage
facilities in the Atlantic Ocean off of South-West Cameroon.
The pipeline essentially cuts diagonally across Cameroon,
bisecting the regions forests.
Prior to project approval, and throughout the construction
process, NGO’s located in Chad, Cameroon and internationally,
expressed concerns about the environmental and socio
impact of the project. Concerns included the lack of
transparency of the governments of both Chad and Cameroon
, potential public health threats arising from a sudden
influx of workers in previously rural areas, environmental
degradation including dust pollution, the contamination
of water sources and impacts on wildlife and forests,
as well as the impact of the pipeline on indigenous
populations.
This report arose out of a 17-day field visit to Cameroon
and focuses on the impact of the pipeline on the environment
and indigenous people of Cameroon. The visit included
interviews with NGOs, the private sector, and local
community members, as well as site visits to pipeline
corridors and stations in Kribi, Cameroon. The report
is divided into three sections. The first section documents
the history of the pipeline project including financing
structure, environmental assessments, and attempts by
the World Bank to address NGO concerns. The second section
focuses on the pipeline’s impact on indigenous
people and the environment,
|
|
with a particular focus on
the method and means of compensation for loss of land
and resources. The third section will address issues surrounding
the Campo Ma’an National Park established by the
government of Cameroon to offset environmental degradation
resulting from the pipeline construction.
II. BACKGROUND OF THE CHAD-CAMEROON
PIPELINE PROJECT
i. Project funding
The total estimated cost of the Chad-Cameroon pipeline
was 3.7 billion U.S. with joint financing from the governments
of Chad and Cameroon, the World Bank, and the private
sector. ExxonMobil led an Oil Consortium made up of
ExxonMobil, Petronas-Malaysia and Chevron which supplemented
the $93 million dollars in loans contributed by the
World Bank. From the World Bank’s perspective,
the pipeline provided “an unprecedented framework
to transform oil wealth into direct benefits for the
poor.”

Figure 1 - Pipeline corridor
marker at Kirbi
In order to achieve the World Bank’s goal of
sustainable development through oil revenues, the World
Bank under |
| |
| |
| |
|
|
| |