BACK to the Papers>>




PAPERS : Chad-Cameroon Pipeline Project
page 3 of 6
Socio-Environmental Impact of the Chad-Cameroon Pipeline Project
Sarah E. Perkins, B.A. (Hon); JD candidate 2004, University of Toronto Faculty of Law
The Canadian Great Ape Alliance
     prev | next 
     

Management Plan which identified three areas particularly vulnerable to the increased access. These areas included the plateau of the Mbéré River Valley between Ouantounon and Mayo Dabi; the northern section of the Deng Deng forest between the Pangar and Lom Rivers, and the southern Deng Deng forest Area between Bélabo and Nanga-Eboko. The Deng Deng forest region is a primary habitat of Gorilla and Chimpanzees and thus posed a particular risk for increased hunting both for the bushmeat trade and as a food source for the pipeline crew. The Access Management Plan’s focus was on preventing vehicular access on the pipeline management roads, through the installation of gates and monitoring, as well as educations plans and the prohibition of bushmeat consumption by pipeline crew during working hours, or while living in pipeline crew housing.
While on paper the Access Management Plan thus address some of the issues raised by the enhanced forest access, on the ground the new pipeline access roads remain fairly accessible by vehicle, and certainly remain accessible by foot. That the Access Management Plan turned its mind to these issues, in particular to the issue of bushmeat consumption amongst its crew, should be recognized, however, as a significant accomplishment for those who have been attempting to raise awareness about the bushmeat trade.

ii. Water Pollution
A second problem resulting from the construction phase of the pipeline was the contamination of local water sources used for drinking, agriculture, and fishing. Of particular concern were the pollution of several marches (Chad) and the failure of pipeline crews to remove forest debris from riverbeds. Increased river sedimentation and reduced water flow in some regions has reportedly also had a significant impact on fishing. A number of communities have reported that their drinking water sources were contaminated following construction, however, due to the insufficiency of baseline data these reports cannot be substantiated.
The risk of further water contamination due to oil leaks or spills will always remain a danger. The pipeline’s exit point at Kribi threatens a fragile marine ecosystem with great tourism potential. If an oil spill were to occur, it would obviously be disastrous for the surrounding communities. Many have expressed concern that the pipeline will not be maintained to the level required in more developed nations.

A. Community Health Concerns
The influx of construction workers may also have resulted in an increase in local HIV rates in both Chad and Cameroon. While the project was one of the first of

  its kind to implement an HIV strategy to help prevent the transmission of disease including the provision of condoms, education and HIV screening for pipeline workers, concerns about HIV and the pipeline have not been alleviated. With the high rate of HIV amongst truck drivers and prostitutes in Cameroon, one of the major issues was the potential movement of HIV from Cameroon to Chad, a country that had previously been spared the ravages of the disease so common in many other African nations. An American health expert hired by the governments of Chad and Cameroon to look into the issue has stated, “You had all the conditions for the virus to work its way into central Chad with the truck drivers." The Oil Consortium has further been criticized for failing to provide HIV treatment to workers who test positive for the virus.

 

Figure 3 - Falls at Kribi

B. Compensation for Environmental Loss
Post-pipeline construction, the major issue of debate has been the method of compensation for loss of property, crops, and natural resources per se. In assessing the adequacy of compensation, this report focuses on compensation provided to indigenous Bantu and Baygeli people in South-West Cameroon.

i. Failure to compensate the Baygeli
While both the Bantu and Baygeli are considered to be indigenous people they are in fact separate groups with distinct cultures and ways of life. The Bantu are an agricultural people, with fixed villages and crops enabling the

 

    7 Full details of the Induced Access Management Plan is available at: http://www.essochad.com/Chad/People/Programs/Chad_PG_IndAccess.asp (Last accessed November 14, 2003)
     8 During the visit to Cameroon, the author was able to access a “restricted” access road by vehicle, and also witnessed poachers accessing the forest by way of a pipeline management road. The poachers were on foot, and officials monitoring the road (which was gated to restrict vehicular access) made no effort to restrict their entry.
    9 Supra note 7

      10 Unfortunately no baseline data on HIV rates in construction zones was taken, and thus increases in HIV rates cannot be confirmed. See the International Advisory Group: Mission Report April 21-May 10, 2003 available at www.gic-iag.org at para. 255
    11 See, Ken Silverstein, “Aids Could Follow african pipeline” Los Angeles Times, June 18, 2003.AIDS Could Follow African Pipeline
    12 The terms natural resources or environment per se, used interchangeable, are used to refer to environmental resources with non-commercial value.
     prev | next 

 

 

 


home
 | about usprograms | bushmeat crisisdonate |
how you can help | papers | store | links | contact us

 
© The Canadian Ape Alliance www.great-apes.com 2006