| PAPERS
: Chad-Cameroon Pipeline Project |
| page 3 of 6 |
| Socio-Environmental Impact of
the Chad-Cameroon Pipeline Project |
Sarah E. Perkins, B.A. (Hon);
JD candidate 2004, University of Toronto Faculty of Law
The Canadian Great Ape Alliance |
| |
|
| |
|
|
| Management Plan which identified
three areas particularly vulnerable to the increased
access. These areas included the plateau of the Mbéré
River Valley between Ouantounon and Mayo Dabi; the northern
section of the Deng Deng forest between the Pangar and
Lom Rivers, and the southern Deng Deng forest Area between
Bélabo and Nanga-Eboko. The Deng Deng forest
region is a primary habitat of Gorilla and Chimpanzees
and thus posed a particular risk for increased hunting
both for the bushmeat trade and as a food source for
the pipeline crew. The Access Management Plan’s
focus was on preventing vehicular access on the pipeline
management roads, through the installation of gates
and monitoring, as well as educations plans and the
prohibition of bushmeat consumption by pipeline crew
during working hours, or while living in pipeline crew
housing.
While on paper the Access Management Plan thus address
some of the issues raised by the enhanced forest access,
on the ground the new pipeline access roads remain fairly
accessible by vehicle, and certainly remain accessible
by foot. That the Access Management Plan turned its
mind to these issues, in particular to the issue of
bushmeat consumption amongst its crew, should be recognized,
however, as a significant accomplishment for those who
have been attempting to raise awareness about the bushmeat
trade.
ii. Water Pollution
A second problem resulting from the construction phase
of the pipeline was the contamination of local water
sources used for drinking, agriculture, and fishing.
Of particular concern were the pollution of several
marches (Chad) and the failure of pipeline crews to
remove forest debris from riverbeds. Increased river
sedimentation and reduced water flow in some regions
has reportedly also had a significant impact on fishing.
A number of communities have reported that their drinking
water sources were contaminated following construction,
however, due to the insufficiency of baseline data these
reports cannot be substantiated.
The risk of further water contamination due to oil leaks
or spills will always remain a danger. The pipeline’s
exit point at Kribi threatens a fragile marine ecosystem
with great tourism potential. If an oil spill were to
occur, it would obviously be disastrous for the surrounding
communities. Many have expressed concern that the pipeline
will not be maintained to the level required in more
developed nations.
A. Community Health Concerns
The influx of construction workers may also have resulted
in an increase in local HIV rates in both Chad and Cameroon.
While the project was one of the first of
|
|
its kind to implement an HIV
strategy to help prevent the transmission of disease including
the provision of condoms, education and HIV screening
for pipeline workers, concerns about HIV and the pipeline
have not been alleviated. With the high rate of HIV amongst
truck drivers and prostitutes in Cameroon, one of the
major issues was the potential movement of HIV from Cameroon
to Chad, a country that had previously been spared the
ravages of the disease so common in many other African
nations. An American health expert hired by the governments
of Chad and Cameroon to look into the issue has stated,
“You had all the conditions for the virus to work
its way into central Chad with the truck drivers."
The Oil Consortium has further been criticized for failing
to provide HIV treatment to workers who test positive
for the virus.

Figure 3 - Falls at Kribi
B. Compensation for Environmental Loss
Post-pipeline construction, the major issue of debate
has been the method of compensation for loss of property,
crops, and natural resources per se. In assessing the
adequacy of compensation, this report focuses on compensation
provided to indigenous Bantu and Baygeli people in South-West
Cameroon.
i. Failure to compensate the Baygeli
While both the Bantu and Baygeli are considered to be
indigenous people they are in fact separate groups with
distinct cultures and ways of life. The Bantu are an
agricultural people, with fixed villages and crops enabling
the |
| |
| |
| |
|
|
| |